As is ridiculously shown above, in the darkness happily runs a man, shouldering the privacy of the celebrities as a bomb to attract public’s attention, rushing to the news press, with another one from the news office welcoming his arrival. In the middle of the second picture stands a naked man, astonished by the huge amount of personal privacy pouring out of the mobile phone. There has been a heated discussion about these pictures recently in the newspaper. Simple as the pictures are, they do demonstrate certain thought-provoking social phenomenon.

如圖所示，黑暗中一個(gè)人開(kāi)心的扛著一個(gè)寫(xiě)著名人隱私的炸彈，沖進(jìn)了報(bào)社，而門(mén)口的那個(gè)人正在歡迎著他的到來(lái)。另一幅圖的中央站了一個(gè)****的人，正吃驚的看著從手機(jī)的屏幕中涌出的大量的個(gè)人隱私。最近報(bào)紙上對(duì)這樣的圖片有著熱烈的討論。盡管圖畫(huà)很簡(jiǎn)單，但是卻揭示了某種令人深思的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象。

The pictures tell us that the intrusion on other’s privacy and revealing it in the press are not only harmful but also detrimental . what’s more, our society fails to attach due attention to this problem. Firstly, some practitioners of low moral standards in the journalism, however, are tempted to focus on other’s privacy, especially some newsworthy celebrities’, such as love affairs, family relationship, medical history and its like, to attract more readers to buy their magazines or to increase their website’s PV(page view), and ultimately to lure more clients to pour money for advertisements. Secondly, The regulator and the authority turn a blind eye to this situation and make it the a real grey area. Furthermore, the public’s aesthetic taste of elegance is still far behind.

這些圖畫(huà)告訴我們窺探他人的隱私并把其暴露于媒體上是非常有害的。我們的社會(huì)并沒(méi)有足夠的關(guān)注這個(gè)問(wèn)題。首先，有一些道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不高的資訊從業(yè)者為了吸引更多的讀者購(gòu)買(mǎi)他們的雜志，為了提高他們網(wǎng)站的訪(fǎng)問(wèn)量，并能最終吸引更多的廣告客戶(hù)，他們會(huì)去關(guān)注其他人的隱私，尤其是有資訊價(jià)值的名人的隱私，這些隱私包括緋聞，家庭關(guān)系，病史等等。其次，政府和監(jiān)管者對(duì)于這一現(xiàn)象往往是視而不見(jiàn)，這樣使其成為了真正的灰色區(qū)域。進(jìn)一步的講，大眾的高雅的審美情趣還遠(yuǎn)未形成。

In my view, we are deeply convinced that everyone has the right to the privacy, the basic right which should be respected, protected and guaranteed by our laws and regulations under whatever circumstances. Princess Diana shows how bad things could end. It is also imperative that the public’s aesthetic taste be so enhanced and promoted that eventually build up a harmonious scene in which people can enjoy their live tranquilly and peacefully.

在我看來(lái)，我們相信每個(gè)人都有權(quán)擁有自己的隱私。在任何環(huán)境下，我們的法律和法規(guī)都應(yīng)該尊重，保護(hù)，保障這樣的基本權(quán)利。戴安娜王妃的事例就已經(jīng)表明了事情會(huì)有多糟糕。同樣，大眾的審美情趣應(yīng)該得到足夠的提升，這樣我們才有可能最終形成一個(gè)和諧的場(chǎng)景，人們能安靜祥和的享受他們的生活。

As is ridiculously shown above, in the darkness happily runs a man, shouldering the privacy of the celebrities as a bomb to attract public’s attention, rushing to the news press, with another one from the news office welcoming his arrival. In the middle of the second picture stands a naked man, astonished by the huge amount of personal privacy pouring out of the mobile phone. There has been a heated discussion about these pictures recently in the newspaper. Simple as the pictures are, they do demonstrate certain thought-provoking social phenomenon.

如圖所示，黑暗中一個(gè)人開(kāi)心的扛著一個(gè)寫(xiě)著名人隱私的炸彈，沖進(jìn)了報(bào)社，而門(mén)口的那個(gè)人正在歡迎著他的到來(lái)。另一幅圖的中央站了一個(gè)****的人，正吃驚的看著從手機(jī)的屏幕中涌出的大量的個(gè)人隱私。最近報(bào)紙上對(duì)這樣的圖片有著熱烈的討論。盡管圖畫(huà)很簡(jiǎn)單，但是卻揭示了某種令人深思的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象。

The pictures tell us that the intrusion on other’s privacy and revealing it in the press are not only harmful but also detrimental . what’s more, our society fails to attach due attention to this problem. Firstly, some practitioners of low moral standards in the journalism, however, are tempted to focus on other’s privacy, especially some newsworthy celebrities’, such as love affairs, family relationship, medical history and its like, to attract more readers to buy their magazines or to increase their website’s PV(page view), and ultimately to lure more clients to pour money for advertisements. Secondly, The regulator and the authority turn a blind eye to this situation and make it the a real grey area. Furthermore, the public’s aesthetic taste of elegance is still far behind.

這些圖畫(huà)告訴我們窺探他人的隱私并把其暴露于媒體上是非常有害的。我們的社會(huì)并沒(méi)有足夠的關(guān)注這個(gè)問(wèn)題。首先，有一些道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不高的資訊從業(yè)者為了吸引更多的讀者購(gòu)買(mǎi)他們的雜志，為了提高他們網(wǎng)站的訪(fǎng)問(wèn)量，并能最終吸引更多的廣告客戶(hù)，他們會(huì)去關(guān)注其他人的隱私，尤其是有資訊價(jià)值的名人的隱私，這些隱私包括緋聞，家庭關(guān)系，病史等等。其次，政府和監(jiān)管者對(duì)于這一現(xiàn)象往往是視而不見(jiàn)，這樣使其成為了真正的灰色區(qū)域。進(jìn)一步的講，大眾的高雅的審美情趣還遠(yuǎn)未形成。

In my view, we are deeply convinced that everyone has the right to the privacy, the basic right which should be respected, protected and guaranteed by our laws and regulations under whatever circumstances. Princess Diana shows how bad things could end. It is also imperative that the public’s aesthetic taste be so enhanced and promoted that eventually build up a harmonious scene in which people can enjoy their live tranquilly and peacefully.

在我看來(lái)，我們相信每個(gè)人都有權(quán)擁有自己的隱私。在任何環(huán)境下，我們的法律和法規(guī)都應(yīng)該尊重，保護(hù)，保障這樣的基本權(quán)利。戴安娜王妃的事例就已經(jīng)表明了事情會(huì)有多糟糕。同樣，大眾的審美情趣應(yīng)該得到足夠的提升，這樣我們才有可能最終形成一個(gè)和諧的場(chǎng)景，人們能安靜祥和的享受他們的生活。