久久国产一二三_国产亚洲精品久久久久久大师_久久久久久久久浪潮精品_日日草天天干_国内精品视频饥渴少妇在线播放_日韩视频一区二区三区四区

GRE Issue寫作范文詳細(xì)解析

雕龍文庫 分享 時(shí)間: 收藏本文

GRE Issue寫作范文詳細(xì)解析

  編輯點(diǎn)評(píng): GRE的issue寫作非常強(qiáng)調(diào)寫作的深刻,觀點(diǎn)的深刻以及論據(jù)的有力和充分,本文為大家推薦了一篇Issue的范文,希望通過此文可以對(duì)GRE考生的寫作備考有所幫助。

  通過以下的范文,大家學(xué)習(xí)到寫作GRE Issue類作文的好的方法,積累一定的詞匯和句子,靈活運(yùn)用到自己的作文中。

  Topic

  The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine: The decline in the numbers of amphibians worldwide clearly indicates the global pollution of water and air. Two studies of amphibians in Yosemite National Park in California confirm my conclusion. In 1915 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were abundant numbers of each species. However, in 1992 there were only four species of amphibians observed in the park, and the numbers of each species were drastically reduced. The decline in Yosemite has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the park s waters, which began in 1920 . But the introduction of trout cannot be the real reason for the Yosemite decline because it does not explain the worldwide decline.

  Sample Essay

  In this argument, the writer of the letter concludes that global pollution of water and air has caused a decline in the number of amphibians worldwide. To support his or her conclusion, the writer cites the results of two studies, seventy-five years apart, that purportedly show that the number of amphibians in one park in California, Yosemite National Park, have drastically declined. Additionally, the writer casts aside a given reason for the decline, stating that the introduction of trout to the park does not explain the worldwide decline in the number of amphibians. This argument defies simple logic and suffers from several critical fallacies.

  First of all, the argument is based on only two studies in one specific part of the world, Yosemite National Park in California. It is impossible to pinpoint a worldwide theory for the decline of amphibians based on any number of studies in only one specific location in the world - the specific varieties of amphibians, geographical conditions and other location specific variables prohibit such a sweeping generalization. One very specific location cannot be used as a model for all other locations, even within one particular country, let alone the entire world. The writer provides no evidenced whatsoever that links the Yosemite study with any purported effects anywhere else in the global environment.

  Secondly, the two separate studies were done seventy-five years apart. There is no evidence that the two studies were conducted in a similar manner over the same duration of time or even over the same exact areas of Yosemite National Park, or that the exact same study methods were used. For example, perhaps the first study lasted over an entire year and was conducted by twenty-five experts in amphibious biology, resulting in the finding of seven species of amphibians in abundant numbers. By contrast, perhaps the second study was conducted over a period of one week by a lone high school student as a school science project. The writer offers no basis on which to compare the two studies, leaving it open as to whether the two are truly comparable in their breadth, scope and expertise.

  Finally, the writer notes that the decline in the amphibian population has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the park s waters in 1920, but then dismisses that argument on the purely specious basis that it does not explain the worldwide decline. This part of the argument blithely dismisses the very relevant fact that trout are known to eat amphibian eggs. This attempt to prove a negative is the last resort of those in search of some vain attempt to prove the truth of the matter that they are asserting. It is basically impossible to prove a negative this is an attempt to shift the burden of proof back on to the nonbelievers of the argument. The global environmental situation and that of Yosemite National Park are not perfectly correlated, and the fact that the trout may very well be responsible for the decline cannot simply be dismissed without further proof.

  In summary, the writer fails to establish any causal relationship between global air and water pollution and the decline of amphibious life worldwide. The evidence presented is extremely weak at best and narrowly focuses on one tiny area of the globe, as well as putting forward as proof two studies about which almost nothing is known. For a stronger argument, the writer would need to directly put forth evidence associating air and water pollution with not only the decline at Yosemite but also throughout other areas of the world.

  下述文字摘自一封致某環(huán)保雜志編輯的信函: 全球兩棲動(dòng)物數(shù)量的減少明顯標(biāo)志著全球性水與大氣的污染。對(duì)加利福尼亞州約塞米蒂國家公園內(nèi)兩棲動(dòng)物所作的兩項(xiàng)研究可證實(shí)我的這一結(jié)論。1915年公園內(nèi)有七個(gè)物種的兩棲動(dòng)物,每一物種都擁有豐富的種群數(shù)量。然而,1992年,在公園內(nèi)所能觀察到的兩棲動(dòng)物物種僅為四類,且每一物種的種群數(shù)量已驟然下降。約塞米蒂公園動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少被歸咎于始于1920年的將鮭魚引入公園水域的做法。但鮭魚的引入不可能成為約塞米蒂公園動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少的真正原因,因?yàn)樗鼰o法來解釋全球范圍內(nèi)的動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少。

  上文的內(nèi)容非常詳細(xì),大家要好好利用它們,切忌生搬硬套,祝大家考出好成績。

  

  編輯點(diǎn)評(píng): GRE的issue寫作非常強(qiáng)調(diào)寫作的深刻,觀點(diǎn)的深刻以及論據(jù)的有力和充分,本文為大家推薦了一篇Issue的范文,希望通過此文可以對(duì)GRE考生的寫作備考有所幫助。

  通過以下的范文,大家學(xué)習(xí)到寫作GRE Issue類作文的好的方法,積累一定的詞匯和句子,靈活運(yùn)用到自己的作文中。

  Topic

  The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine: The decline in the numbers of amphibians worldwide clearly indicates the global pollution of water and air. Two studies of amphibians in Yosemite National Park in California confirm my conclusion. In 1915 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were abundant numbers of each species. However, in 1992 there were only four species of amphibians observed in the park, and the numbers of each species were drastically reduced. The decline in Yosemite has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the park s waters, which began in 1920 . But the introduction of trout cannot be the real reason for the Yosemite decline because it does not explain the worldwide decline.

  Sample Essay

  In this argument, the writer of the letter concludes that global pollution of water and air has caused a decline in the number of amphibians worldwide. To support his or her conclusion, the writer cites the results of two studies, seventy-five years apart, that purportedly show that the number of amphibians in one park in California, Yosemite National Park, have drastically declined. Additionally, the writer casts aside a given reason for the decline, stating that the introduction of trout to the park does not explain the worldwide decline in the number of amphibians. This argument defies simple logic and suffers from several critical fallacies.

  First of all, the argument is based on only two studies in one specific part of the world, Yosemite National Park in California. It is impossible to pinpoint a worldwide theory for the decline of amphibians based on any number of studies in only one specific location in the world - the specific varieties of amphibians, geographical conditions and other location specific variables prohibit such a sweeping generalization. One very specific location cannot be used as a model for all other locations, even within one particular country, let alone the entire world. The writer provides no evidenced whatsoever that links the Yosemite study with any purported effects anywhere else in the global environment.

  Secondly, the two separate studies were done seventy-five years apart. There is no evidence that the two studies were conducted in a similar manner over the same duration of time or even over the same exact areas of Yosemite National Park, or that the exact same study methods were used. For example, perhaps the first study lasted over an entire year and was conducted by twenty-five experts in amphibious biology, resulting in the finding of seven species of amphibians in abundant numbers. By contrast, perhaps the second study was conducted over a period of one week by a lone high school student as a school science project. The writer offers no basis on which to compare the two studies, leaving it open as to whether the two are truly comparable in their breadth, scope and expertise.

  Finally, the writer notes that the decline in the amphibian population has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the park s waters in 1920, but then dismisses that argument on the purely specious basis that it does not explain the worldwide decline. This part of the argument blithely dismisses the very relevant fact that trout are known to eat amphibian eggs. This attempt to prove a negative is the last resort of those in search of some vain attempt to prove the truth of the matter that they are asserting. It is basically impossible to prove a negative this is an attempt to shift the burden of proof back on to the nonbelievers of the argument. The global environmental situation and that of Yosemite National Park are not perfectly correlated, and the fact that the trout may very well be responsible for the decline cannot simply be dismissed without further proof.

  In summary, the writer fails to establish any causal relationship between global air and water pollution and the decline of amphibious life worldwide. The evidence presented is extremely weak at best and narrowly focuses on one tiny area of the globe, as well as putting forward as proof two studies about which almost nothing is known. For a stronger argument, the writer would need to directly put forth evidence associating air and water pollution with not only the decline at Yosemite but also throughout other areas of the world.

  下述文字摘自一封致某環(huán)保雜志編輯的信函: 全球兩棲動(dòng)物數(shù)量的減少明顯標(biāo)志著全球性水與大氣的污染。對(duì)加利福尼亞州約塞米蒂國家公園內(nèi)兩棲動(dòng)物所作的兩項(xiàng)研究可證實(shí)我的這一結(jié)論。1915年公園內(nèi)有七個(gè)物種的兩棲動(dòng)物,每一物種都擁有豐富的種群數(shù)量。然而,1992年,在公園內(nèi)所能觀察到的兩棲動(dòng)物物種僅為四類,且每一物種的種群數(shù)量已驟然下降。約塞米蒂公園動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少被歸咎于始于1920年的將鮭魚引入公園水域的做法。但鮭魚的引入不可能成為約塞米蒂公園動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少的真正原因,因?yàn)樗鼰o法來解釋全球范圍內(nèi)的動(dòng)物數(shù)量減少。

  上文的內(nèi)容非常詳細(xì),大家要好好利用它們,切忌生搬硬套,祝大家考出好成績。

  

周易 易經(jīng) 代理招生 二手車 網(wǎng)絡(luò)營銷 旅游攻略 非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn) 查字典 精雕圖 戲曲下載 抖音代運(yùn)營 易學(xué)網(wǎng) 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)資訊 成語 詩詞 工商注冊 抖音帶貨 云南旅游網(wǎng) 網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲 代理記賬 短視頻運(yùn)營 在線題庫 國學(xué)網(wǎng) 抖音運(yùn)營 雕龍客 雕塑 奇石 散文 常用文書 河北生活網(wǎng) 好書推薦 游戲攻略 心理測試 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 考研真題 漢語知識(shí) 心理咨詢 手游安卓版下載 興趣愛好 網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識(shí) 十大品牌排行榜 商標(biāo)交易 單機(jī)游戲下載 短視頻代運(yùn)營 寶寶起名 范文網(wǎng) 電商設(shè)計(jì) 免費(fèi)發(fā)布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 經(jīng)典范文 優(yōu)質(zhì)范文 工作總結(jié) 二手車估價(jià) 實(shí)用范文 石家莊點(diǎn)痣 養(yǎng)花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發(fā)型 搜搜作文 鋼琴入門指法教程 詞典 讀后感 玄機(jī)派 企業(yè)服務(wù) 法律咨詢 chatGPT國內(nèi)版 chatGPT官網(wǎng) 勵(lì)志名言 文玩 語料庫 游戲推薦 男士發(fā)型 高考作文 PS修圖 兒童文學(xué) 工作計(jì)劃 舟舟培訓(xùn) IT教程 手機(jī)游戲推薦排行榜 暖通,電地暖, 女性健康 苗木供應(yīng) ps素材庫 短視頻培訓(xùn) 優(yōu)秀個(gè)人博客 包裝網(wǎng) 創(chuàng)業(yè)賺錢 養(yǎng)生 民間借貸律師 綠色軟件 安卓手機(jī)游戲 手機(jī)軟件下載 手機(jī)游戲下載 單機(jī)游戲大全 石家莊論壇 網(wǎng)賺 職業(yè)培訓(xùn) 資格考試 成語大全 英語培訓(xùn) 藝術(shù)培訓(xùn) 少兒培訓(xùn) 苗木網(wǎng) 雕塑網(wǎng) 好玩的手機(jī)游戲推薦 漢語詞典 中國機(jī)械網(wǎng) 美文欣賞 紅樓夢 道德經(jīng) 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)件 電地暖 鮮花 書包網(wǎng) 英語培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu) 電商運(yùn)營
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美三级韩国三级日本三斤 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区照片91 | 国产福利二区 | 久久久久久久成人 | 久久久亚洲精品视频 | 国产精品观看 | 久久中文网 | 中韩乱幕日产无线码一区 | 天天综合精品 | 疯狂欧洲av久久成人av电影 | 美女很黄很黄免费的 | 97视频成人 | 精品国产31久久久久久 | 免费爱爱视频 | 亚洲免费影院 | 玖玖国产精品视频 | 精品一区二区三区在线观看国产 | 黄色在线亚洲 | 日本一本色道免费视频 | 欧洲一区 | 亚洲国产精品成人va在线观看 | 夜夜精品视频一区二区 | julia中文字幕久久一区二区 | 99国产精品99久久久久久 | a黄色 | 黄色毛片免费看 | 国产精品一二三四区 | 久久亚洲美女 | 爱爱免费 | 色婷婷一区二区三区四区成人网 | 国产精品久久久久久吹潮 | 欧美成人生活片 | www.激情网 | 欧美日韩视频一区二区三区 | 婷婷久久五月天 | 国产精品久久久久7777婷婷 | 国产日韩欧美 | 自拍视频国产 | 久久久一区二区三区 | 91视频在线观看 | 一区在线免费 |